Here, via NOBL, and in much greater detail than I could manage on Sunday, is New York magazine’s longform take on what’s happening over at the NYT.
There’s a lot here, but I’m especially impressed with the typologies (institutionalists vs. insurrectionists vs. techsurrectionists) and the conundrum expressed in the killer closing line.
Who’s editing the paper, who’s reading it, who’s writing it, and what each wants of the others is a matter worth paying attention to. The world keeps asking, it seems, if all that matters still fits, or if what’s fitted really matters.
Colin Steele 